Re: [pysieved] 1.0

[Farkas Levente <lfarkas at bppiac dot hu>]

Neale Pickett wrote:
> Farkas Levente <lfarkas at bppiac dot hu> writes:
> 
>> hi,
>> it seems there is not too much progress in the way to 1.0. should we
>> wait for the 1.0 or better to use the head?
> 
> Unless there are any objections, I'll release the current version as 1.0
> in a few weeks.  So go ahead and try head, and let me know how it goes
> for you.
> 
> 
> There was some enthusiasm about pysieved at first, and then I had to run
> away and not work on it.  When I got back, I found people didn't seem to
> need all the sweeping changes I had planned, because they'd managed to
> get it working and had moved on to other things.
> 
> I guess that's a good thing, though: it works so well that nobody wants
> to hack on it!

so finnaly i get it there to create an rpm for it and it seems to ready,
but there are a few problems:-(
my users in a mysql database and have more virtual domains and dovecot
use it at the same time postfix use dovecot-auth (not directly mysql.
- can i use it with dovecot-auth both for auth and user?
- or should i have to use directly mysql (i'd prefer dovecot-auth!)?
- should have to apply Koan's patch?
- which auth socket use in mux /var/run/dovecot/auth-master or
  /var/spool/postfix/private/auth?
if i'm ready i'll send the spec file which would be useful to include in
the tarbal in the toplevel dir to be able to recompile with a
rpmbuild -ta tarbal


-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"